Scientist Solutions: Life Science Discussions
 Refer A Friend    Link To Us    Bookmark Us       

English - Chinese             
Do you purchase antibodies?
Please participate in a brief survey and make a donation to medical research charities at the same time.  5 minutes = 50 cents  
Take the survey now >>
You are in Bioethics Forum >> Conflicts of Interest Sub-forum

New Engalnd Journal of Medicine and Conflicts of Interest

RSS Feed

Omai
United States

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Genetics, Cancer & Bioethics Moderator
Genetics, Cancer & Bioethics Moderator



Topic Started by Omai
on 1/12/2009 10:01 AM
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

It looks like the New England Journal of Medicine published a lung cancer screening study in which the authors failed to disclose that they were funded by GE, the makers of the CT scanners that the study reported to be useful in detecting early lung cancer in smokers.

This sort of practice is highly unethical, even when the outcome is supposedly "good" (screening for cancer).

Here is a link to a blog about the topic in the Boston Globe:
http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2009/01/12/new_england_journal_changes_policies/

Omai


Replies
Kvachhani
India

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Froglet
Froglet



Posted By Kvachhani on 1/13/2009 3:48 AM
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

said:


yes this is totaly unethical.



R Bishop
United States

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Administration & Protein Detection Moderator
Administration & Protein Detection Moderator



Posted By R Bishop on 1/13/2009 7:51 AM
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Get this not only was it funded by GE but also by Tobacco.

Here's the article in NYTimes

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/health/research/26lung.html

Rus

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler."
-- Einstein





Related Topics
Thank You to Our Sponsor