Award
 Refer a Friend  Bookmark us  Link To Us  Home
 
Solutions Search! The Customized Life Science Search Engine
Search Site
Search Suppliers
Search Internet
Search over 6000 life science websites specifically selected by our expert scientist moderators.

Other Topics
4/9/2005 12:58 AM
5/1/2004 08:28 PM
Best Bioreactors for High Concentration Mab's(8 Votes)
Integra CELLine flask CL1000  62.50% -5 Votes
Miniperm  25.00% -2 Votes
Wave Bioreactor  12.50% -1 Votes
Subscribet to topic
bottom of page RSS Feed Topic Feed
 Best Bioreactors for High Concentration Mab's [View Printable]
marcia

Adult Frog

Avatar of marcia
See
Similar
Scientists



View Blogs


Group: Admin
Posts: 158
Joined: Mar 17, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to marcia Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Pick which bioreactor performs best and give us your comments.
.........................

 Posted May 01, 2004, 20:46 PM
marcia

Adult Frog

Avatar of marcia
See
Similar
Scientists



View Blogs


Group: Admin
Posts: 158
Joined: Mar 17, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to marcia Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

The CELLine flask is by far the best for research scale antibody production. You almost always see a 20 fold increase in concentration. And contamination is rarely an issue like in the miniperm. Alex Karu did a comprehensive paper at UC-Berkeley comparing the miniperm to the CL1000.

The miniperm couldn't even finish a run without contamination and the concentration was .25mg/ml. The CL1000 produced on average 2 mg/ml and in 40 days produced on average 140 mgs of mab.

The wave is is just a big bag without a semipermeable membrane so you still have to purify a large quantity of sup.
And you are going to use alot of serum.

And the CL1000 is also really good for CHO and 293 for expressing protein.

The CL1000 seems expensive but the Karu article shows that w/ the serum and labor savings, it is inexpensive. With the CL1000 it is so much easier to purify compared with ascites which alot of junk in it - including virus.

Just make sure w/ the CL1000 to harvest from the right port! and to let the cells get to 5 x 10 E8 before harvesting - it should look like a milkshake.
.........................

Posted May 17, 2004, 1:16 AM
Soudabeh

Moderator

Avatar of Soudabeh





Group: Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Apr 23, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to Soudabeh Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

marcia said:
Pick which bioreactor performs best and give us your comments.


I think roller bottles can be a good alternative since cell Line flasks are so expensive.
.........................

Posted Oct 09, 2004, 17:09 PM
NathF

Frog Egg

[ Privacy ]





Group: Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Oct 09, 2004







Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I think wave bioreactor can be a good way since it is scalable
.........................
[ Privacy ]

Posted Oct 11, 2004, 13:32 PM
may

Frog Egg

Avatar of may





Group: Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Oct 12, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to may Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I agree with the last post regarding scalability of wave bioreactor.
.........................

Posted Oct 13, 2004, 2:55 AM
Germey

Frog Egg

Avatar of Germey





Group: Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Nov 03, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to Germey Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Like so many things in science, the best one will depend on your specific needs. I used to provide tech support for the miniPERM, and it really does have some technical advantages over the CeLLine in that the constant motion promotes gas exchange and is advantageous for growth on microcarriers. Marcia obviously had some bad experiences with the MiniPERM, but I dealt with several large academic labs that had problems with the CeLLine and were very happy with the MiniPERM. The biggest problem with the MiniPERM is the price. I am not sure if that is getting better since the distribution changed, b