|
11/19/2008 08:51 AM
|
|
11/11/2008 02:47 PM
|
|
11/11/2008 09:17 AM
|
|
9/30/2008 06:52 AM
|
|
9/20/2008 01:00 PM
|
|
9/18/2008 10:14 AM
|
|
9/4/2008 09:25 AM
|
|
8/27/2008 11:22 AM
|
|
8/9/2008 10:37 AM
|
|
8/6/2008 09:43 AM
|
|
7/21/2008 06:12 AM
|
|
7/21/2008 06:12 AM
|
|
7/21/2008 06:55 AM
|
|
7/21/2008 05:59 AM
|
|
7/8/2008 07:31 PM
|
|
7/2/2008 12:25 AM
|
|
5/9/2008 11:42 AM
|
|
4/26/2008 11:54 AM
|
|
1/28/2008 09:49 PM
|
|
1/19/2008 02:27 PM
|
|
12/20/2007 06:14 PM
|
|
11/16/2007 08:00 PM
|
|
11/5/2007 03:00 PM
|
|
10/25/2007 04:09 PM
|
|
10/25/2007 03:27 PM
|
|
10/10/2007 10:43 AM
|
|
10/9/2007 09:34 AM
|
|
9/27/2007 03:31 PM
|
|
9/17/2007 04:30 AM
|
|
9/13/2007 09:26 PM
|
|
Problematic Basal Expression Levels [View Printable]
|
wzhang
Group: Member Posts: 1 Joined: Aug 11, 2008
|
I am currently trying to purify a GST-fusion protein from E. Coli. The first small-scale trial after transformation of the E. Coli yielded stunning, nearly ideal results. The induced samples yielded generous portions of protein, while the uninduced samples produced very little.
I am incubating the E. Coli to an optical density of .6-1.5 before induction. Then, IPTG is added to a final concentration of .05 mM. It is incubated at 37 degrees C for three hours, with vigorous shaking (200 rpm).
For the second trial, I tried to extend the first trial's success to a large-scale purification. This failed. There was very little noticeable difference between the induced and uninduced cultures. I guessed that it may have been a problem with the basal expression level, so I tried two more large-scale experiments using 2xYT medium containing 1% and 2% glucose. Nada.
Then I wondered if it was a problem with the cells, that perhaps only the first-generation newly transformed E. Coli were able to effectively express the protein. I transformed a new batch of cells and tried again. Once again, very little difference between the basal and the induced expression levels.
I am going to try going back to growth medium without glucose and see if the glucose could have inhibited protein expression in any way. I also have hunches that the protein may be toxic to E. Coli, limiting the amount that can be produced, or that the protein may be being degraded in the large-scale trials. However, I have no feasible explanation for why this did not occur in the first small scale trial. I'm quite stumped. Any insights, comments, or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
|
.........................
|
| Posted Aug 11, 2008, 14:15 PM |
|
|
|
R Bishop
Group: Admin Posts: 304 Joined: Jan 17, 2006
|
wzhang,
Wow that is too bad. In this situation, you must have done something different in the small scale experiment. Have you changed any key reagents? Bought new supplies? There must be one thing that changed in the scale up. Typically I always start by analyzing the big three. Time, temprature, and concentration. Unfortunately in your situation, you got 2 things to deal with the bacteria and the IPTG. Were your cultures made fresh and split at the right times? I had a similar experience, when I got lazy and tried to scale up with bacteria that were in lag growth phase.
Keep us posted with your results and WRITE down everything you do.
RB
|
......................... "To those who would tear the world down: We will defeat you. To those who seek peace and security: We support you. And to all those who have wondered if America's beacon still burns as bright: Tonight, we proved once more that the true strength of our nation comes not from the might of our arms or the scale of our wealth, but from the enduring power of our ideals: democracy, liberty, opportunity and unyielding hope."
-- Barack Obama, Nov. 4, 2008
|
| Posted Aug 14, 2008, 15:04 PM |
|
|
|
kriodos
Group: Member Posts: 14 Joined: Jul 21, 2008
|
are you sure that in the first time you get the real protein? did you check the protein obtained is not a contamination of one of your labmates? After the second large scale transformation and indcution whereas you don't get anithing, Di you check that the conmstruction have the rigth secuence? My advice. a)Check construction b)Transform Bl21 cells c)"wash" the petri plates with the bl21 transformed cells and use as inoculo of the lage scale purification. At least 1 plaque (50-200 colonies) per half liter of culture plus the antibiotic. d) induce with 1mM IPTG If this dosn't work you are in a throuble good luck
|
.........................
|
| Posted Aug 27, 2008, 11:15 AM |
|
|
|
Add colour 2 ur life
Group: Member Posts: 35 Joined: Sep 13, 2006
|
hi
Yes,I agree with Bishop. Temparature,Inducer,time and media are the key elements for bacterial expression.
increase the IPTG concentration to 0.5mM instead 0.05. After induction reduce temparature to 25-30Degree and keep it for overnight.
While doing your analysis make sure that you are keeping od normalization/pellet:lysis buffer ratio same with and without induced sample.
better to normalize the od to 10 both and analyze it may tell exact expression level.
All the best.
|
.........................
|
| Posted Sep 29, 2008, 6:57 AM |
|
|
|
|
top of page
|
|
Forum Jump
|
|