Award
 » Home » Analytical Chemistry » Spectrometry (Atomic, Electron, Mass) » Troubleshooting low relative response on a mass spec. after source cleaning
 
Solutions Search! The Customized Life Science Search Engine
Search Site
Search Suppliers
Search Internet
Search over 6000 life science websites specifically selected by our expert scientist moderators.

Other Topics
7/8/2008 01:16 PM
ICP-MS Recommendations fo ...
6/18/2008 10:37 AM
Helium Leak
5/22/2008 11:53 PM
Tandem mass spectra
3/21/2008 03:47 AM
CdS Determination Via ICP ...
3/18/2008 08:44 PM
Thermo Fisher Scientifics ...
2/27/2008 06:00 PM
Thermo Fisher Scientific ...
2/18/2008 07:22 PM
Aspectrics Appoints Scien ...
2/14/2008 07:48 PM
Thermo Scientific LTQ Orb ...
8/3/2007 08:20 AM
ICPs
7/27/2007 08:29 PM
Argon filter for ICP-OES
12/5/2006 07:30 AM
ICP MS interference
11/13/2006 03:13 AM
mesh used in the mass spe ...
9/15/2006 10:25 PM
GFAAS trouble
8/18/2006 01:13 AM
trace metals in oils usin ...
7/4/2006 10:29 PM
FAAS for Manganese
5/4/2006 02:43 PM
MS for API release testin ...
3/30/2006 06:10 PM
E BOOK
1/31/2006 04:14 AM
Cadmium on GFAAS
1/23/2006 03:08 PM
Boron on gfaas
11/3/2005 07:11 PM
measurement of biomarkers ...
7/27/2005 09:31 AM
Estimation of Mercury in ...
5/24/2005 09:41 AM
N-terminal sequencing/iTR ...
1/25/2005 05:28 PM
MS for amino acids
Subscribet to topic
bottom of page RSS Feed Topic Feed
 Troubleshooting low relative response on a mass spec. after source cleaning [View Printable]
Boswell

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Jun 07, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to Boswell Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I cleaned a mass spec. source the other day and after pumping it back down discovered that something terribly wrong happened.
Responses are around 10 fold lower than precleaning, isotope assignments are off and the entrance lens is at 0 when it usually runs around 14.
I've heard that maybe the quad. cap was nicked upon reinsertion of the source body. Any other ideas?
.........................

 Posted Jun 07, 2008, 18:51 PM
mbicking

Tadpole

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mar 03, 2008







 Go to homepage of mbicking Send a personal messsage to mbicking Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Please give us more information about the type of instrument you have and the type of samples you are analyzing.

Also, please describe your "cleaning" procedure in more detail.
.........................
M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.

Posted Jun 09, 2008, 10:21 AM
Boswell

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Jun 07, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to Boswell Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I am using an Agilent 5973 GC/MS. I cleaned the source with methanol and silica, then rinsed in methylene chloride twice then methanol.
I work in a forensic toxicology lab so it is derivatized samples that we are running; usually BSTFA.
.........................

Posted Jun 09, 2008, 8:29 AM Last edited Jun 09, 2008, 8:36 AM by Boswell
mbicking

Tadpole

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mar 03, 2008







 Go to homepage of mbicking Send a personal messsage to mbicking Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

There are several possibilities, so let's look at some simple things first.

First, is this the first time you have cleaned this source, or is this just the first time you have had a problem?

Did you do any other maintenance during the source cleaining? (septum, inlet liner, gold seal, etc.) If so, check that those procedure were done correctly and that you have no leaks.

Check the position of the colum in the MS and re-adjust as necessary. It may be simple positioning.


.........................
M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.

Posted Jun 09, 2008, 17:40 PM
Boswell

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Jun 07, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to Boswell Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I'm just thinking that it must be the quad cap. Is this what it looks like when on cracks or gets chipped upon source reinsertion? I've never encountered it.
.........................

Posted Jun 09, 2008, 15:47 PM
mbicking

Tadpole

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mar 03, 2008







 Go to homepage of mbicking Send a personal messsage to mbicking Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

A also checked with my repair expert and the other suggestion was that you may have switeched the wires for the entrance lens and ion focus lens (blue and orange, I believe). Try switching them to see if the problem goes away, and write back with a report.
.........................
M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.

Posted Jun 09, 2008, 17:54 PM
gpronger

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 7
Joined: May 29, 2008







 Go to homepage of gpronger Send a personal messsage to gpronger Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

One of the ways to fairly easily check how your lens are working is to perform a parameter ramps on each of them (repeller, ion focus, entrance lens, entrance lens offset, and x-ray). It is usually pretty obvious if one is "mis-behaving".

Also, once you've solved whatever is causing your current problem, hard copy each profile when the system is newly cleaned and running well, and keep these around for reference (I tend to like to do this after every time I clean the source). They are then very good references as time passes and the system gets dirty.

Good luck with your problem.

Greg
.........................

Posted Jun 10, 2008, 9:13 AM
Dr. Analytical

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists



View Blogs


Group: Moderators
Posts: 24
Joined: Jun 09, 2008







 Go to homepage of Dr. Analytical Send a personal messsage to Dr. Analytical Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Greg:
Thanks for the extra information and suggestions. Please keep coming back. We need more people like you in this forum.

.........................
Dr. Analytical

Posted Jun 10, 2008, 11:43 AM
Boswell

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Jun 07, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to Boswell Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Thanks Greg. OK- here's what I got:
Repeller: looks fine
Entrance lens offset: fine
x-ray- not familiar with that- do I have that option?
Entrance lens: 219 & 502 are OK but 69 looks jagged
Ion focus: looks like crap- all jagged.

Does this help?
I've put sources together for 10 years, I know to not let the leads touch the source body. The orance and blue wires are hooked up properly. What am I overlooking?
Thanks for your insight.
.........................

Posted Jun 10, 2008, 10:20 AM Last edited Jun 10, 2008, 10:37 AM by Boswell
top of page

Forum Jump