| saswati1 said: |
| I would say talk to the company whose product you are using. You did not mention the company name. it is hard to say |
Hi Saswati1
This is the background:
I use a PGL3 plasmid which contains a luc gene under control of a cloned promoter region which is induced by adding certain drugs. When I cotransfect this reporter with expression plasmids encoding certain proteins I see a suppression of the luc reporter. Having done this in a 1:1 ratio (e.g. 250ng/250ng in 500ng total) I observe a 50% suppression of the luc activity.
My inquiry is not related to the luc reporter that I use. I have done control transfections with internal luc reporters from PROMEGA together with my particular experimental reporters from the same company to test for differences in transfection efficiency, cell viability and effects of certain drugs that I use to induce cells (and reporters) with. However, my question is which approach to take to monitor a stronger effect than I already see in my preliminary experiments.
And this is what I actually want to know:
Should I take into account the molar ratio of my two plasmids. The reporter containing the promoter region is smaller (approx. 5kb) than the expression plasmid (approx. 7.5kb), and if I add more of the latter to compensate for the difference in size (which affects how many copies of each plasmid that are taken up by cells and eventually encoded into protein) I probably get a higher suppression of the luc reporter. Or, should I use another approach to investigate how many molecules of suppressive factor are needed for complete (relatively) suppression of luc activity of my particular reporter?
Sincerely
Michael