Scientist Solutions: Life Science Discussions
 Refer a Friend    Link To Us    Bookmark Us       

      
 » Home » Analytical Chemistry » Chromatography » RP-HPLC chromatograph interpretation

Other Topics
11/20/2008 09:31 PM
Melamine analysis
11/3/2008 11:56 AM
IEX-HPLC for peptide mapp ...
10/29/2008 11:06 PM
Empty Capsule Testing by ...
10/16/2008 09:07 AM
Trace GC + Fisons AS800 a ...
10/6/2008 11:07 AM
formic acid HPLC
9/14/2008 04:03 PM
Queries
9/12/2008 10:10 PM
Formic Acid Quantitation
9/10/2008 06:20 AM
Formic acid quantitation
9/10/2008 06:26 AM
GC - Pump down
9/4/2008 09:11 AM
Base line Problems
8/28/2008 09:05 AM
chromatogram shape and in ...
8/19/2008 07:35 AM
detergent and lipids in F ...
8/14/2008 01:34 PM
Auto injector errors
8/10/2008 12:50 AM
HPLC for peptides
7/18/2008 10:06 AM
thiocyanate
7/16/2008 10:23 PM
A Good Site for Chemical ...
6/17/2008 01:01 PM
New Chromatography Softwa ...
5/29/2008 08:43 AM
GC FID detector with high ...
5/28/2008 06:49 PM
Dionex PAD-2
5/27/2008 09:36 AM
Does different HPLC syste ...
4/22/2008 02:07 PM
GC baseline problems
3/30/2008 03:08 PM
SHimadzu autosampler Ques ...
3/24/2008 08:31 PM
HPLC separation of colla ...
3/17/2008 02:10 PM
Ultra Performance Liquid ...
3/17/2008 02:12 PM
RPHPLC/ separation of sma ...
3/10/2008 08:27 PM
Thermo Fisher Scientific ...
2/17/2008 11:24 AM
Flow analysis and Flow sy ...
2/11/2008 06:19 PM
Thermo Fisher Scientific ...
12/6/2007 08:09 PM
Overly complex flow progr ...
7/31/2007 10:37 AM
Chiral separation of Dexi ...
Subscribet to topic
Add Reply  Add New Topic  Add New Poll
bottom of page RSS Feed 

Topic Feed

 

RP-HPLC chromatograph interpretation

 [View Printable]
charity

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 16, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to charity Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

dear all,

from an RP-HPLC peak report, is it possible to determine the actual concentration of the compund being tested? how? what is the formula? the peak report contains the following information: retention time, area, height, and width.

thanks!:)

.........................

 Posted Apr 17, 2008, 14:47 PM
mbicking

Tadpole

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mar 03, 2008







 Go to homepage of mbicking Send a personal messsage to mbicking Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

The raw peak information from a chromatogram (area, height) is just that; the raw data to be used for other calculations.

You cannot determine the amount of a substance present without first analyzing one or more standards of known concentration. Once you know the relationship between peak area and amount analyzed (called a "response factor"), then you can calculate the quantity in an unknown.

Many data systems will give you an "Area Percent" report, which is just the percentage of the total that each peak represents. This also has limited meaning, since different compounds may have much different response factors.

To summarize, to get an amount value, you will need a standard. More questions? Just write.

.........................
M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.

Posted Apr 17, 2008, 17:02 PM
charity

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 16, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to charity Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Thank you for taking time to answer my query. And yes i do have more questions. :)

Actually I have a standard and the retention time of my "unknown" is within the peak range of that standard. With this, I can say that I have more or less the same substance, right?

The thing is, I'm not satisfied with just saying that I have the same substance in my unknown (qualitative). What I am after now is to report the actual amount of the substance in my sample. You said that I can calculate the quantity in an unknown once I know the response factor. So now, my more important question is how to determine such response factor? What is the formula, if there is any? And how exactly do I use this response factor to compute the quantity of the substance in an unknown?

Again, thanks so much! :)

.........................

Posted Apr 18, 2008, 2:49 AM
mbicking

Tadpole

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mar 03, 2008







 Go to homepage of mbicking Send a personal messsage to mbicking Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Well, we could spend days talking about this, but I will try to keep it a little shorter. :-)

The response factor equation for the standard is:

RF = (Peak Area Std)/(Amount Injected Std)

You can use either concentration or mass, but be consistent in all calculations. It would be best to do several injections and get an average RF.

Now, for your unknown, assume the RF is the same (it's the same compound), and you know the peak area, so you just rearrange the equation for Amount Injected.

Amount Injected (Sample) = (Peak Area Sample)/RF

Again, multiple injections will get a better value.

This is called "Single Point Calibration" because you are only using one standard. It is a good approximation if standard and sample are close in concentration. If not, the accuracy will suffer and you will have to take another approach.

Now, as to whether or not your sample has the same compound: well, that is always something we struggle with. If the retention times are the same (or very close) and the peak shape is the same, we usually ASSUME that it is the same compound. But we really can't say with complete certainty. It is best to have some other information, like an absorbance spectrum or mass spectrum, or some other knowledge of the sample.

This should get you started.

.........................
M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.

Posted Apr 18, 2008, 12:08 PM
charity

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 16, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to charity Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Okay, got it! Your instructions were very clear and concise :) But let me just clarify, in the formula for RF, you were referring to the Peak Area and not the Area %, right?

As to the compound in my sample, I'm pretty confident that I have the same compound as the standard because I only have a single prominent peak in my sample very close to the retention time of the standard. But then again, I really need to firm up my results with further characterization. I intend to do ESI-MS, CD, and FTIR in the next few months. And I'm sure more questions will arise as I am very new to these.

Thanks v. much, Sir! I really appreciate your help. :)

.........................

Posted Apr 18, 2008, 13:29 PM
mbicking

Tadpole

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mar 03, 2008







 Go to homepage of mbicking Send a personal messsage to mbicking Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

You are correct, that you use peak area (or height), not the percent value. The area percent results really have no meaning except to tell you the percentage of the total. There are some specific examples in pharmaceutical analysis where you might be able to get some useful information, but in the general case, no.

Also, I would strongly urge you to get some training in HPLC and analytical chemistry. There are many things to learn; more than I can teach you in this forum. You need to learn how the instrument works, how to use the software, how to troubleshoot problems, and how to set up calibration systems and review results.

There are many resources for training available, including some that I offer. But it is very important that you get it from someone.

.........................
M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.

Posted Apr 18, 2008, 22:13 PM
efoconnor

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Mar 27, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to efoconnor Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

charity said:
Thank you for taking time to answer my query. And yes i do have more questions. :)

Actually I have a standard and the retention time of my "unknown" is within the peak range of that standard. With this, I can say that I have more or less the same substance, right?

The thing is, I'm not satisfied with just saying that I have the same substance in my unknown (qualitative). What I am after now is to report the actual amount of the substance in my sample. You said that I can calculate the quantity in an unknown once I know the response factor. So now, my more important question is how to determine such response factor? What is the formula, if there is any? And how exactly do I use this response factor to compute the quantity of the substance in an unknown?

Again, thanks so much! :)

.........................

Posted Apr 19, 2008, 17:10 PM
efoconnor

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Mar 27, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to efoconnor Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

charity said:
dear all,

from an RP-HPLC peak report, is it possible to determine the actual concentration of the compund being tested? how? what is the formula? the peak report contains the following information: retention time, area, height, and width.

thanks!:)

qualitative certainty is greatest with MS if that mode will work for you. Next is scanning UV or PDA. You can also spike std into your unknown. THis should give a higher peak without shoulders.

.........................

Posted Apr 19, 2008, 17:13 PM
charity

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 16, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to charity Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

mbicking said:

Also, I would strongly urge you to get some training in HPLC and analytical chemistry. There are many things to learn; more than I can teach you in this forum. You need to learn how the instrument works, how to use the software, how to troubleshoot problems, and how to set up calibration systems and review results.

There are many resources for training available, including some that I offer. But it is very important that you get it from someone.



Oh yes, I really intend to attend formal trainings with respect to the analytical tools that I will use in the near future. I am just waiting for an opportunity because trainings like this in our country is very seasonal/rare.

Thanks for the advice! :)

.........................

Posted Apr 20, 2008, 8:07 AM
mbicking

Tadpole

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mar 03, 2008







 Go to homepage of mbicking Send a personal messsage to mbicking Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

You did not mention which country you live in, but you should be able to find some good training that is not too far away. The manufacturer of your instrument may offer classes in your country, or a nearby country. And you can look for a Chromatography organization that may offer training also.

Good luck with your learning. We hope to hear from you again.

.........................
M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.

Posted Apr 20, 2008, 17:09 PM
charity

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 16, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to charity Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Ah right! I really appreciate all your suggestions and I will start looking for trainings right away, or as soon as I finish my thesis. I'm an MS Biology student from the Philippines.

Thank you again Sir. :)

.........................

Posted Apr 20, 2008, 20:59 PM
charity

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 16, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to charity Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

efoconnor said:

qualitative certainty is greatest with MS if that mode will work for you. Next is scanning UV or PDA. You can also spike std into your unknown. THis should give a higher peak without shoulders.


Thank you for the above0-mentioned suggestions. I will definitely consider them in my next experiments. :)

.........................

Posted Apr 20, 2008, 21:37 PM
NARRA

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 1
Joined: May 19, 2008







Send an ICQ messsage to NARRA Send a personal messsage to NARRA Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

[color=deeppink][/color] % Purity= (Area of sample/Area of Std)* con.Std/Con.Sample*DF*100

.........................
Narendra BAbu Narra

Posted May 19, 2008, 6:40 AM
top of page Add Reply  Add New Topic  Add New Poll

Forum Jump