|
11/20/2008 09:31 PM
|
|
11/3/2008 11:56 AM
|
|
10/29/2008 11:06 PM
|
|
10/16/2008 09:07 AM
|
|
10/6/2008 11:07 AM
|
|
9/14/2008 04:03 PM
|
|
9/12/2008 10:10 PM
|
|
9/10/2008 06:20 AM
|
|
9/10/2008 06:26 AM
|
|
9/4/2008 09:11 AM
|
|
8/28/2008 09:05 AM
|
|
8/19/2008 07:35 AM
|
|
8/14/2008 01:34 PM
|
|
8/10/2008 12:50 AM
|
|
7/18/2008 10:06 AM
|
|
7/16/2008 10:23 PM
|
|
6/17/2008 01:01 PM
|
|
5/29/2008 08:43 AM
|
|
5/28/2008 06:49 PM
|
|
5/27/2008 09:36 AM
|
|
4/22/2008 02:07 PM
|
|
3/30/2008 03:08 PM
|
|
3/24/2008 08:31 PM
|
|
3/17/2008 02:10 PM
|
|
3/17/2008 02:12 PM
|
|
3/10/2008 08:27 PM
|
|
2/17/2008 11:24 AM
|
|
2/11/2008 06:19 PM
|
|
12/6/2007 08:09 PM
|
|
7/31/2007 10:37 AM
|
|
RP-HPLC chromatograph interpretation [View Printable]
|
charity
Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: Apr 16, 2008
|
dear all,
from an RP-HPLC peak report, is it possible to determine the actual concentration of the compund being tested? how? what is the formula? the peak report contains the following information: retention time, area, height, and width.
thanks!:)
|
.........................
|
Posted Apr 17, 2008, 14:47 PM |
|
|
|
mbicking
Group: Member Posts: 26 Joined: Mar 03, 2008
|
The raw peak information from a chromatogram (area, height) is just that; the raw data to be used for other calculations.
You cannot determine the amount of a substance present without first analyzing one or more standards of known concentration. Once you know the relationship between peak area and amount analyzed (called a "response factor"), then you can calculate the quantity in an unknown.
Many data systems will give you an "Area Percent" report, which is just the percentage of the total that each peak represents. This also has limited meaning, since different compounds may have much different response factors.
To summarize, to get an amount value, you will need a standard. More questions? Just write.
|
......................... M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D. ACCTA, Inc.
|
| Posted Apr 17, 2008, 17:02 PM |
|
|
|
charity
Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: Apr 16, 2008
|
Thank you for taking time to answer my query. And yes i do have more questions. :)
Actually I have a standard and the retention time of my "unknown" is within the peak range of that standard. With this, I can say that I have more or less the same substance, right?
The thing is, I'm not satisfied with just saying that I have the same substance in my unknown (qualitative). What I am after now is to report the actual amount of the substance in my sample. You said that I can calculate the quantity in an unknown once I know the response factor. So now, my more important question is how to determine such response factor? What is the formula, if there is any? And how exactly do I use this response factor to compute the quantity of the substance in an unknown?
Again, thanks so much! :)
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 18, 2008, 2:49 AM |
|
|
|
mbicking
Group: Member Posts: 26 Joined: Mar 03, 2008
|
Well, we could spend days talking about this, but I will try to keep it a little shorter. :-)
The response factor equation for the standard is:
RF = (Peak Area Std)/(Amount Injected Std)
You can use either concentration or mass, but be consistent in all calculations. It would be best to do several injections and get an average RF.
Now, for your unknown, assume the RF is the same (it's the same compound), and you know the peak area, so you just rearrange the equation for Amount Injected.
Amount Injected (Sample) = (Peak Area Sample)/RF
Again, multiple injections will get a better value.
This is called "Single Point Calibration" because you are only using one standard. It is a good approximation if standard and sample are close in concentration. If not, the accuracy will suffer and you will have to take another approach.
Now, as to whether or not your sample has the same compound: well, that is always something we struggle with. If the retention times are the same (or very close) and the peak shape is the same, we usually ASSUME that it is the same compound. But we really can't say with complete certainty. It is best to have some other information, like an absorbance spectrum or mass spectrum, or some other knowledge of the sample.
This should get you started.
|
......................... M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D. ACCTA, Inc.
|
| Posted Apr 18, 2008, 12:08 PM |
|
|
|
charity
Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: Apr 16, 2008
|
Okay, got it! Your instructions were very clear and concise :) But let me just clarify, in the formula for RF, you were referring to the Peak Area and not the Area %, right?
As to the compound in my sample, I'm pretty confident that I have the same compound as the standard because I only have a single prominent peak in my sample very close to the retention time of the standard. But then again, I really need to firm up my results with further characterization. I intend to do ESI-MS, CD, and FTIR in the next few months. And I'm sure more questions will arise as I am very new to these.
Thanks v. much, Sir! I really appreciate your help. :)
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 18, 2008, 13:29 PM |
|
|
|
mbicking
Group: Member Posts: 26 Joined: Mar 03, 2008
|
You are correct, that you use peak area (or height), not the percent value. The area percent results really have no meaning except to tell you the percentage of the total. There are some specific examples in pharmaceutical analysis where you might be able to get some useful information, but in the general case, no.
Also, I would strongly urge you to get some training in HPLC and analytical chemistry. There are many things to learn; more than I can teach you in this forum. You need to learn how the instrument works, how to use the software, how to troubleshoot problems, and how to set up calibration systems and review results.
There are many resources for training available, including some that I offer. But it is very important that you get it from someone.
|
......................... M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D. ACCTA, Inc.
|
| Posted Apr 18, 2008, 22:13 PM |
|
|
|
efoconnor
Group: Member Posts: 3 Joined: Mar 27, 2008
|
| charity said: | Thank you for taking time to answer my query. And yes i do have more questions. :)
Actually I have a standard and the retention time of my "unknown" is within the peak range of that standard. With this, I can say that I have more or less the same substance, right?
The thing is, I'm not satisfied with just saying that I have the same substance in my unknown (qualitative). What I am after now is to report the actual amount of the substance in my sample. You said that I can calculate the quantity in an unknown once I know the response factor. So now, my more important question is how to determine such response factor? What is the formula, if there is any? And how exactly do I use this response factor to compute the quantity of the substance in an unknown?
Again, thanks so much! :) |
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 19, 2008, 17:10 PM |
|
|
|
efoconnor
Group: Member Posts: 3 Joined: Mar 27, 2008
|
| charity said: | dear all,
from an RP-HPLC peak report, is it possible to determine the actual concentration of the compund being tested? how? what is the formula? the peak report contains the following information: retention time, area, height, and width.
thanks!:) |
qualitative certainty is greatest with MS if that mode will work for you. Next is scanning UV or PDA. You can also spike std into your unknown. THis should give a higher peak without shoulders.
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 19, 2008, 17:13 PM |
|
|
|
charity
Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: Apr 16, 2008
|
| mbicking said: | Also, I would strongly urge you to get some training in HPLC and analytical chemistry. There are many things to learn; more than I can teach you in this forum. You need to learn how the instrument works, how to use the software, how to troubleshoot problems, and how to set up calibration systems and review results.
There are many resources for training available, including some that I offer. But it is very important that you get it from someone.
|
Oh yes, I really intend to attend formal trainings with respect to the analytical tools that I will use in the near future. I am just waiting for an opportunity because trainings like this in our country is very seasonal/rare. Thanks for the advice! :)
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 20, 2008, 8:07 AM |
|
|
|
mbicking
Group: Member Posts: 26 Joined: Mar 03, 2008
|
You did not mention which country you live in, but you should be able to find some good training that is not too far away. The manufacturer of your instrument may offer classes in your country, or a nearby country. And you can look for a Chromatography organization that may offer training also.
Good luck with your learning. We hope to hear from you again.
|
......................... M. K. L. Bicking, Ph.D. ACCTA, Inc.
|
| Posted Apr 20, 2008, 17:09 PM |
|
|
|
charity
Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: Apr 16, 2008
|
Ah right! I really appreciate all your suggestions and I will start looking for trainings right away, or as soon as I finish my thesis. I'm an MS Biology student from the Philippines.
Thank you again Sir. :)
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 20, 2008, 20:59 PM |
|
|
|
charity
Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: Apr 16, 2008
|
| efoconnor said: | qualitative certainty is greatest with MS if that mode will work for you. Next is scanning UV or PDA. You can also spike std into your unknown. THis should give a higher peak without shoulders. |
Thank you for the above0-mentioned suggestions. I will definitely consider them in my next experiments. :)
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 20, 2008, 21:37 PM |
|
|
|
NARRA
Group: Member Posts: 1 Joined: May 19, 2008
|
[color=deeppink][/color]
% Purity= (Area of sample/Area of Std)* con.Std/Con.Sample*DF*100
|
......................... Narendra BAbu Narra
|
| Posted May 19, 2008, 6:40 AM |
|
|
|
|
top of page
|
|
Forum Jump
| |