Award
 Refer a Friend  Bookmark us  Link To Us  Home
 
Solutions Search! The Customized Life Science Search Engine
Search Site
Search Suppliers
Search Internet
Search over 6000 life science websites specifically selected by our expert scientist moderators.

Other Topics
6/10/2008 02:47 AM
4/28/2008 01:10 AM
3/30/2008 01:23 PM
3/25/2008 02:58 PM
11/17/2007 12:54 PM
10/26/2007 09:49 PM
9/25/2007 03:20 PM
7/4/2007 04:22 PM
9/12/2007 08:38 AM
9/7/2007 06:57 PM
8/22/2006 02:27 PM
6/5/2007 01:38 PM
11/28/2005 04:34 AM
4/10/2007 02:16 PM
5/17/2007 01:24 PM
4/5/2007 09:44 PM
4/3/2007 04:42 PM
3/7/2007 09:57 PM
1/6/2007 03:02 AM
1/19/2007 08:15 PM
12/18/2004 12:39 AM
9/11/2005 01:08 PM
10/3/2006 02:09 PM
8/18/2006 09:09 AM
8/2/2006 10:15 PM
7/3/2006 09:12 AM
4/13/2006 01:46 PM
3/27/2006 05:16 PM
12/15/2005 02:07 PM
12/15/2005 05:26 PM
Subscribet to topic
bottom of page RSS Feed Topic Feed
 proteins not detected at predicted MW [View Printable]
Murphy

Frog Egg

Avatar of Murphy
See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 25, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to Murphy Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Why is it that many proteins do not migrate on SDS-PAGE gels at their predicted size. What is the best way of determining that the band is due to the protein in question and not non-specific? Is using a known control good enough. I have used a purchased positive control and found that the protein was detected at a higher mw than bands from my sample but no other bands were detected. Can someone explain why that is?
I use 4-20% gradient gels and proteins from mostly mouse and rat brain tissue and both human and glioma cell lines
.........................

 Posted Mar 25, 2008, 17:28 PM
R Bishop

Frog Laureate

Avatar of R Bishop
See
Similar
Scientists



View Blogs


Group: Moderators
Posts: 243
Joined: Jan 17, 2006







 Send a personal messsage to R Bishop Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Murphy,

The rate of protein migration depends upon the net charge, size and shape. Thus any of these parameters will make a protein migrate differently at typically a higher apparent molecular weight.

Another possibility is aberrant glycosylation, which can make a protein run faster or slower than "controls" that might be expressed in a different system e.g., yeast vs E. coli vs mammalian cells. I suspect your "positive control" was expressed in a non-mammalian system, check the stat sheet. I have had this problem as well. You can also do a "Site Search" in the left corner of any page on the board for deglycosylation enzymes like PNGaseF that might help settle the issue.

The best controls are specific antibodies. Im not sure whether you are running a Western blot or stained gel to detect your protein, but there are many posts in this forum with discussions on the proper controls for both. I suggest trying the "Site Search" to look through them.

Let us know how things work out.

Rb
.........................

Posted Mar 26, 2008, 0:21 AM
xixu0229

Frog Egg

Avatar of xixu0229
See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mar 26, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to xixu0229 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Like previously stated, glycosylation and phosphorylation will retard (no jokes please) the migration. Most of times, those two things are the reason for a higher molecular weight. There are kits out there to remove the attached parts.

I was confused over your comments. Are you saying that your protein standard is running differently as well?? If so, you might want to check if you are using the lammeli formulation or a bis-tris formulation buffer.

visit my site
www.mytetracell.com