|
Ab / peptide immobilization [View Printable]
|
samm
Group: Moderators Posts: 360 Joined: Mar 03, 2005
|
Has anybody used the Pierce (Now Thermo scientific) Sulfolink Ab immobilization kits? Do those work better for small peptides (e.g. ones used for Ab affinity purification) than the carboxyl-crosslinking systems? And finally, does the cysteine based background quenching affect protein binding properties (again, for e.g Ab-peptide interactions)?
|
.........................
|
| Posted Mar 14, 2008, 21:27 PM |
|
|
|
samm
Group: Moderators Posts: 360 Joined: Mar 03, 2005
|
Just for the record, the SulfoLink kit worked pretty well, with nearly 65% of the loaded peptide being immobilized. Between 50-80% of non-specific binding (depending on cell type: the original Ab showed no difference, now I see distinct expression differences between neutrophils and monocytes) was eliminated, based on FC assays with different dilutions/blocking peptide.
|
.........................
|
| Posted May 30, 2008, 13:56 PM |
|
|
|
Mangarita
Group: Member Posts: 2 Joined: Jun 13, 2008
|
| samm said: | | Has anybody used the Pierce (Now Thermo scientific) Sulfolink Ab immobilization kits? Do those work better for small peptides (e.g. ones used for Ab affinity purification) than the carboxyl-crosslinking systems? And finally, does the cysteine based background quenching affect protein binding properties (again, for e.g Ab-peptide interactions)? |
I have preowned products that might be able to help Michael
|
.........................
|
| Posted Jun 19, 2008, 0:24 AM |
|
|
|