Scientist Solutions: Life Science Discussions
 Refer a Friend    Link To Us    Bookmark Us       

      
 » Home » Nanotechnology » Post Ideas/Find a Collaborator/Funding Opportunities » The Evolution of Nanotechnology

Other Topics
10/24/2008 11:26 AM
Molecular Biology
5/22/2008 03:50 AM
Nanomission: A Game about ...
3/31/2008 05:28 AM
Improvement of making nan ...
3/2/2008 05:54 PM
Nanotechnology
8/16/2007 04:01 PM
Nanotechnology: The Futur ...
4/6/2007 09:53 PM
DoD Executive Summare
4/2/2007 03:06 PM
National Nanotechnology I ...
3/20/2007 05:10 AM
Center for Nanotechnology ...
5/18/2006 12:01 PM
help !!!!
1/6/2006 06:02 PM
I would like to learn abo ...
11/15/2005 07:05 PM
Thank you forum
Subscribet to topic
Add Reply  Add New Topic  Add New Poll
bottom of page RSS Feed 

Topic Feed

 

The Evolution of Nanotechnology

 [View Printable]
kumar

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists



View Blogs


Group: Moderators
Posts: 75
Joined: Aug 25, 2006







 Go to homepage of kumar Send a personal messsage to kumar Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

A very interesting article in the May issue of Nature Nanotechnology:

http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v2/n5/full/nnano.2007.121.html

Nature Nanotechnology 2, 259 - 261 (2007)
doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.121

Subject Category: Ethical, legal and other societal issues
MBE deserves a place in the history books

W. Patrick McCray1

1. W. Patrick McCray is at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA. e-mail: pmccray@cns.ucsb.edu

"It is common to read that nanotechnology began in December 1959 when Richard Feynman delivered a talk with the title "There's plenty of room at the bottom"1. According to this version of events, Feynman's foresight was confirmed when Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer invented the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) in 1981, with the atomic force microscope following five years later2. Finally, nanotechnology really took off in the late 1990s when governments around the world started investing hundreds of millions of dollars in the field.

However, as a number of historians have pointed out, the history of nanotechnology is more complicated than this: Feynman's lecture, for example, was initially much less influential than is widely believed3, 4. Simple histories of nanotechnology also tend to overlook some experimental techniques: molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), for instance, played a central role in the growth and development of nanoscience and nanotechnology, yet it is rarely mentioned in popular or historical accounts".

.........................

Posted May 08, 2007, 18:17 PM
top of page Add Reply  Add New Topic  Add New Poll

Forum Jump