|
2D IEF - mini gels Vs. big gels [View Printable]
|
gsovak
Group: Member Posts: 544 Joined: Jan 25, 2005
|
Dear All, Today I had a debate with one of my fellow scientist rgarding 2D-IEF gels. The qeustion is wether one benefits much more from running big gels 17 cm instead of 8 cm gels? What is you take on this issue? Guy
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 17, 2007, 1:56 AM |
|
|
|
Charon
Group: Member Posts: 2 Joined: Jul 24, 2006
|
Depends on what you want to do, of course. In general I prefer large gels (24 cm) in order to get a higher resolution, seperate more proteins and it is easier for me to do mass spec later on. But then I am also interested in whole proteome analyses. Disadvantages are costs and time, of course. I usually only do small gels as a control of the sample.
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 23, 2007, 14:55 PM |
|
|
|
gsovak
Group: Member Posts: 544 Joined: Jan 25, 2005
|
Thanks for your take on this one. I personaly used mini gels with a very good seperation of the lisosomal membrane. Had arround 300 spots. if you are planning dong just westerns than I guess mini would be the best quickest way. Guy
|
.........................
|
| Posted Apr 24, 2007, 20:32 PM |
|
|
|