Award
 » Home » High-Throughput Screening » High-Throughput Proteomic Tools » Another luminex question
 
Solutions Search! The Customized Life Science Search Engine
Search Site
Search Suppliers
Search Internet
Search over 6000 life science websites specifically selected by our expert scientist moderators.

Other Topics
2/21/2008 10:31 PM
shotgun proteomics
2/21/2007 01:39 PM
What is the future of HTS ...
12/5/2006 04:39 PM
Luminex technologies
Subscribet to topic
bottom of page RSS Feed Topic Feed
 Another luminex question [View Printable]
Hoyeta

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 12, 2007







 Send a personal messsage to Hoyeta Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I am considering using a Luminex based assay to measure protein expression. Does anyone have a way to normalize for variability in cell density/well?
.........................

Posted Feb 15, 2007, 16:42 PM
gsovak

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Jan 25, 2005







 Send a personal messsage to gsovak Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Hi ,
Welcome on board ScientisSolutions,
Sorry i didnt answer you earlier.
The way i am doing it is but nrmelizing to total protein concentration.
Guy
.........................

Posted Feb 15, 2007, 16:50 PM
Hoyeta

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 12, 2007







 Send a personal messsage to Hoyeta Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Thanks for your response. I will be measuring sups from attached cells, and would prefer not to detach the cells until after I get the results of quantitiation, so I would be looking for some secreted "housekeeping-like" gene that I could use to get an idea of cell mass.
.........................

Posted Feb 15, 2007, 17:01 PM
gsovak

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Jan 25, 2005







 Send a personal messsage to gsovak Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Still, after you will finish you assay, you can wash the plate twice with PBS. Then add some RIPA buffer for 10 min on ice. After that you can do a protein concentration assay. We use BCA.
Guy
.........................

Posted Feb 15, 2007, 20:15 PM
1whitetiger

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 21, 2008







 Send a personal messsage to 1whitetiger Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Hoyeta said:
I will be measuring sups from attached cells, and would prefer not to detach the cells until after I get the results of quantitiation, so I would be looking for some secreted "housekeeping-like" gene that I could use to get an idea of cell mass.


The "housekeeping" protein you are looking for may be problematic. Your choice will be dependent upon your cell type, since there is no one protein that is constitutively secreted by every cell, and determining which proteins are constitutively secreted by your cell type may be difficult.

I think you have two options:

1) Those who use ELISA for detecting proteins in cell or tissue lysates will often express their results as mg protein/mg cell mass. In your case, this would essentially measure the amount of protein secreted per cell.

2) Look for your own "housekeeping" proteins in your sample data. No matter which set of proteins you are detecting, there are bound to be several that will change very little in concentration under your experimental conditions. Once you have identified those, you can compare the relative concentrations of other proteins to that "housekeeping" protein.

Or, if the cell density is highly variable, you can look at the ratios of the relative protein expression. You will probably see some kind of pattern...the absolute concentrations may change slightly for a set of proteins, but the relative ratios of these will not. These are your "housekeeping" proteins. You can then use these for normalization of your results.

Notice that neither of these methods is truly measuring the "concentration" in solution, only the relative amount of protein secreted. If this is what you need rather than the absolute concentrations, you could use an antibody array. These assays use multiple capture antibodies spotted onto a grid pattern on a solid surface to measure relative differences in protein expression levels, not just yes or no. It detects many proteins in the low pg/ml range, and you can measure with changes in expression of even 1.5-fold with good accuracy.

This would probably be cheaper than using Luminex, and if you use a membrane-based array, you wouldn't need a flow cytometer, just some type of chemiluminescence detection, the same as for a Western.

What kind of secreted proteins are you trying to detect?

.........................

Posted Feb 21, 2008, 22:12 PM
top of page

Forum Jump