Award
 » Home » Microbiology » Microbial Genetics & Molecular Microbiology » monitoring methods
 
Solutions Search! The Customized Life Science Search Engine
Search Site
Search Suppliers
Search Internet
Search over 6000 life science websites specifically selected by our expert scientist moderators.

Other Topics
8/17/2008 03:11 AM
RAPD and viruses
7/8/2008 07:12 AM
Reverse Transcription PCR ...
1/30/2008 07:13 PM
Craig Venter Declares Cre ...
10/8/2007 01:07 PM
TG1
8/29/2007 03:25 AM
Propionibacterium acnes
8/6/2007 08:24 PM
Present-day procariotic c ...
6/18/2007 01:45 PM
lux Operon isolation
3/27/2007 12:48 PM
Genomics Throws Species D ...
3/12/2007 08:19 PM
Wanted Probiotic collabo ...
1/16/2007 01:47 AM
Bacterial community genom ...
12/19/2006 09:41 PM
pseudomonas aerugionosa
11/25/2006 02:04 PM
diabetes: causes notions ...
9/8/2005 07:59 PM
bacterial media
9/7/2005 09:29 AM
Recombinant Bacterial Tec ...
Subscribet to topic
bottom of page RSS Feed Topic Feed
 monitoring methods [View Printable]
Che wizard

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Dec 30, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to Che wizard Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page


three part question:

1. Looking for a quick (<1 hr.), easy, and cheap method to detect bacteria,
2. ability to differentiate (viable and non-), and
3. Is there a way to convert colonies into # of bacteria?

Current method is the modified SM 9215 D membrane filter method, used to monitor of heterotrophic bacteria in ultra-pure water.
Average count: < 1 colony per litre.
.........................

 Posted Dec 30, 2004, 22:11 PM
Scot E. DOwd Ph.D.

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Dec 28, 2004







 Go to homepage of Scot E. DOwd Ph.D. Send a personal messsage to Scot E. DOwd Ph.D. Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

chromotography? labeling with molecular probes viability dye? <1hr would be the tough criteria. I would like to see some responses.
.........................
Scot E. Dowd Ph.D.
http://liru.ars.usda.gov

Posted Jan 04, 2005, 16:59 PM
trook

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 337
Joined: Jan 17, 2005







 Send a personal messsage to trook Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Are you interested in isolating single or multi-species bacteria? With single species bacteria you should be able to come up with a PCR detection assay (if it doesn't already exsist for your species). If you are talking multi-species detection from environmental samples than this probably won't work as well...
.........................

Posted Jan 17, 2005, 22:54 PM
dennsi

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Dec 04, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to dennsi Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Che wizard said:

three part question:

1. Looking for a quick (<1 hr.), easy, and cheap method to detect bacteria,
2. ability to differentiate (viable and non-), and
3. Is there a way to convert colonies into # of bacteria?

Current method is the modified SM 9215 D membrane filter method, used to monitor of heterotrophic bacteria in ultra-pure water.
Average count: < 1 colony per litre.
.........................

Posted Jan 18, 2005, 4:11 AM
trook

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 337
Joined: Jan 17, 2005







 Send a personal messsage to trook Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

As a follow up to my previous comment ... There are pitfalls to PCR detection methods (i.e. detection of nucleic acid does not imply viability, therefore confirmitory outgrowth will be required for each positive result using this method). Here is a recent paper talking about this issue:

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Nov. 2004, p. 54035405 Vol. 42, No. 11
An Unexpected Experimental Pitfall in the Molecular Diagnosis of
Bacterial Endophthalmitis
Luana Ugahary,1 Wendy van de Sande,2 Jan C. van Meurs,1 and Alex van Belkum2*
.........................

Posted Jan 18, 2005, 19:52 PM
trook

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 337
Joined: Jan 17, 2005







 Send a personal messsage to trook Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page


Here is a recent paper comparing two methodologies for identification of mycobacteria. Please note that these methods can be applied to other organisms...


Comparative evaluation of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis: Two amplified targets, hsp65 and rpoB, for identification of cultured mycobacteria
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 19 January 2005,
Wattana Cheunoy, Therdsak Prammananan, Angkana Chaiprasert and Suporn Foongladda
.........................

Posted Jan 27, 2005, 15:57 PM
top of page

Forum Jump