Scientist Solutions: International Life Science Community By Scientists For Scientists
    
Home » Forums » Nanotechnology » Nanomaterials » AFM vs. XRD to measure nanoparticle size

Thanks to our sponsors who make this site possible

AFM vs. XRD to measure nanoparticle size

RSS Feed

Would you like to save this topic, event, protocol or job so you can find it again easily?

Just click the "Save to My Lab Drawer" link and the item will be saved in the My Lab Drawer section of your bench space.

Available to members only. Please log in or register for your free account now.


Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Topic Started by fabrizioBobba
on 4/20/2012 7:14 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

 Dear friends, 

Im working with a multimodeV AFM in AC mode to characterize the size and shape of Ag nanoparticles. Samples are prepared by dropping the nanoparticles on mica sheet. Nanoparticles are clearly visible and well dispersed without forming large aggregates.   Results are showing an average heigth of about 2 nm with a  lateral size of about 15 nm. I supposed that this was due to the tip convolution effect. I used TESP with a nominal apex radius guaranteed <12 nm.

I also performed XRD analysis and I  used the Debye-Scherrer formula to recover the nanoparticle size :  D=0.9*Lambda/(FHWM*cos(Theta)) where lambda is the wave length (0.1541 nm) FWHM is the full width at half maximum of the selected diffraction peak  and Theta is the correspective diffraction angle.   The calculated average value of the particle size by means of XRD seems to be in agreement with the lateral diameter values extrapolated by grain analysis of AFM images but not with the heigths. 
This was surprising me as I supposed AFM height values were more meaningful. Of course I checked with the z-calibration gratings TGZ01 from Mikromash . This calibration test showed the expected step heigths of 20 nm.

I looked in literature and I found several scientific papers claiming a perfect agreement of XRD
  results with AFM lateral size measuraments. But neither an esplicit value of nanoparticles heigths nor the z-scale bar in AFM images was reported.  

Anyone can help me to clarify my doubts?

Thanks in advance Fabrizio


Replies

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Posted By mohan1986physics
on 4/20/2012 16:29 PM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

 Dear Friend,
     First of all we should be very clear about the theoritical determination of grain size analysis by X-ray diffraction analysis.  The method which you have used to determine the average grain size is Debye scherrer method.  But there are some more X-ray line profile analysis to determine the grain size than this Debye scherrer method say W-H plot, modified W-H plots like UDM, USDM, UDEDM plot and size-strain plot.  Compare to Debye Scherrer's method these line profile analysis will give u better results (means more approximate grain size).  Whats special about these methodologies are, the strain, energy densities between the particles will be taken into account while determining the grain size through these W-H series of analysis.  It should be noted that they are all only approximate values of grain size and it may have certain error percentages too.  
     In conclusion, Debye scherrer formula is least approximation of grain size compared with W-H and modified W-H plots.  Also, In Debye scherre formula, the constant 0.9 can be used only when u have spherical morphology of particles, if the morphology of your grains vary from spherical shape, then no longer debye scherrer's equation will help u determine the grain size.  
     Literatures are available about the x-ray line profile analysis to determine particle size.  Try to get those papers.  

with regards

Research scholar,Nonlinear Optical Materials Laboratory, School of Physics, Bharathidasan University,Tiruchirappalli,Tamil Nadu, India



As a Scientist Solutions member, you are able to register a positive vote for any topic which you believe is useful and relevant to our board or any reply which you believe is especially well worded and helpful.

By participating in the voting, you will be helping to identify the best topics & replies on the board.

You may vote once for any one post, and you may not vote for your own posts.

A post (topic or reply) will earn one "thumbs up" icon for every 10 votes received (up to 3 thumbs up), and the person who made the post will also earn two bonus points.

learn more about member points.