Scientist Solutions: International Life Science Community By Scientists For Scientists
    
Home » Forums » Proteomics » Assay Development & Protocols » 2D PAGE of wet plant proteins a problem?

Thanks to our sponsors who make this site possible

2D PAGE of wet plant proteins a problem?

RSS Feed

Would you like to save this topic, event, protocol or job so you can find it again easily?

Just click the "Save to My Lab Drawer" link and the item will be saved in the My Lab Drawer section of your bench space.

Available to members only. Please log in or register for your free account now.

proteome
Zimbabwe

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Topic Started by proteome
on 2/1/2010 9:24 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

I have been working on plant rhizome materials. I have noted with concern that wet materials always gives inferior gels when compared to gels from dry materials. This is in terms of streaking, spot numbers, spoy intensity. The situation is the same even for 1D gels. This is despite the fact that i use the same extraction protocol (phenol based) and treat the proteins similarly!

Why is this? could it be that wet materials have more interfering compounds  and proteases than dry materials? Any suggestions on how to deal with the problem?


Replies
ARGERINE
India

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Cancer, Diagnostics & Proteomics Moderator
Frog Laureate
Posted By ARGERINE
on 2/1/2010 9:35 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Dear Proteome

My first suggestion is to never use the raw material as such for 2DE. Pecipitate your proteins by using any specific protein extraction procedures like TCA-Acetone and then proceed for the down stream electroporesis.

Although I haven't worked wit plant proteins but basic chemistry involved behind the 2DE remains the same and that is salts, carbohydrates, lipids  and phenols interfere with the resolution. Just in case you are also getting streaking in the High Molecular weight region as well that may be due to presence of nucleic acids in your sample.

Gaganjot Singh Truth seems so closer now......



proteome
Zimbabwe

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Posted By proteome
on 2/2/2010 0:43 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Dear Argerine

Thank you for your suggestions. I nomally extract my proteins using a phenol based method and precipitate proteins using 0.1M ammonium acetate in absolute methanol overnight at -20 C. The strange thing is that i have beutiful gels for dry plant  samples but always get heavily streaked samples with wet plant samples.
Dou you suggest that i use a different procedure for wet samples?
Thank you again.



varsha
United States


See Mini bio

Status: Microbiology & Proteomics Moderator
Frog Laureate
Posted By varsha
on 2/2/2010 10:08 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

I suspect that your extraction protocol does not remove lipids and/or DNA/RNA from protein samples. I have never run a 2D gel for plant samples but try to follow the protocol in this paper and see if it reduces streaking.
www.sciencedirect.com/science
http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/57/7/1493

There is an older article for 2D with plant membrane proteins which may also give you some ideas.
www.jstor.org/stable/4270049

You may just need to tweak your protocol just a little to get a better gel. Let us know how you get on.
Good luck!



ARGERINE
India

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Cancer, Diagnostics & Proteomics Moderator
Frog Laureate
Posted By ARGERINE
on 2/2/2010 9:09 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Hi

Although Methanol should solubilize the lipids I recommend a nuclease treatment incase the streaking is only in the high MW region.

Another point of consideration is If the proteins in your sample are completely solubilized or not? In case your sample is having denatured protein it would not be solubilized completely and the microprecipitate will give streaking.

Centrifuge at 14000g or more for 30 min before loading and collect the clear supernatant and then only load.

Try using TCA/ Acetone for your next 2DE.

Gaganjot Singh Truth seems so closer now......



proteome
Zimbabwe

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Posted By proteome
on 2/3/2010 0:15 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Thanks a lot for all your comments. I will make some modifications on my protocol and i will tell you what i get.



dineshibms
India

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Posted By dineshibms
on 3/3/2010 2:48 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Hi,
 i too got these problems while iam doing proteomics. If u follow cold acetone precipitation method it wil surely help in reducing the streaks. And also ur sample wil be free from lipids and phenols and also try to prepare all ur buffer mainly rehydration buffer freshly..  This is the procedure i followed ...

Cool the required volume of acetone to -20oc

Place the protein sample (50 μl) in acetone compatible tube

Add 4 times the sample volume of cold (-20oc) acetone (200 μl) acetone to the tube

Vortex the tube & incubate for 60 min at -20oc

Centrifuge for 10 min at 15000 g at 4oc

Decant & properly dispose the supernatant, protein sample should not to be disturbed

Allow the acetone to evaporate at RT. Do not over dry the pellet, or it may not dissolve properly (~15-30 min)

Resuspend in appropriate buffer (10 μl Rehydration buffer)

S.Dinesh Babu Research Scholar



proteome
Zimbabwe

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Posted By proteome
on 3/3/2010 4:23 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page


Hie All

I am very thankful to you all. I have modified my protocol and use a phenol  protocol based on Hurkman and Tanaka (1986) with some modifications and also ammonium acetate precipitation. Among other changes,  I have also resorted to centrifugation at 14000g for 30 mins before loading the supernatant.

I have attached hereunder , some examples of gels i got from the old protocol and the new protocol. i will also use other protocols you guys have suggested for the sake of comparison.

I am very greatful for your valued contributions.
Please , i welcome all  other advise and suggestions.

Proteome



Attached file: old protocol 1d.jpg
old protocol  1d.jpg


Attached file: New protocol 2d.jpg
New protocol 2d.jpg


Attached file: new protocol 1d.jpg
new protocol 1d.jpg

Last edited Mar 03, 2010, 6:30 AM by proteome

ARGERINE
India

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Cancer, Diagnostics & Proteomics Moderator
Frog Laureate
Posted By ARGERINE
on 3/3/2010 9:37 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Hi

From your electropherograms It seems there still are contaminants present in your final protein extract. Perform TCA acetone purification and solubilize your sample in minimum ionic strength buffer and Give atleast 1 cm stacking in your 1 dimensional gel and you will see the sharpe bands. If possible switch from glycine to Tricine PAGE.

Gaganjot Singh Truth seems so closer now......



proteome
Zimbabwe

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Frog Egg
Frog Egg
Posted By proteome
on 3/4/2010 3:26 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

Thanks ARGERINE. I will try your advice and come back to you.



As a Scientist Solutions member, you are able to register a positive vote for any topic which you believe is useful and relevant to our board or any reply which you believe is especially well worded and helpful.

By participating in the voting, you will be helping to identify the best topics & replies on the board.

You may vote once for any one post, and you may not vote for your own posts.

A post (topic or reply) will earn one "thumbs up" icon for every 10 votes received (up to 3 thumbs up), and the person who made the post will also earn two bonus points.

learn more about member points.