Scientist Solutions: International Life Science Community By Scientists For Scientists
    
Home » Forums » Bioethics » Conflicts of Interest » Compassionate Use and Corporate Profit

Thanks to our sponsors who make this site possible

Compassionate Use and Corporate Profit

RSS Feed

Would you like to save this topic, event, protocol or job so you can find it again easily?

Just click the "Save to My Lab Drawer" link and the item will be saved in the My Lab Drawer section of your bench space.

Available to members only. Please log in or register for your free account now.

SanDiablo
United States

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Froglet
Froglet
Topic Started by SanDiablo
on 9/19/2005 11:27 AM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

1) Should patients be allowed to waive their rights in order to receive a drug that may have questionable side effects?

2) Do companies have a "moral obligation" to provide a drug that may benefit terminally ill patients, even if development or delivery of that drug is not cost effective, thus conflicting with the companies obligations to its shareholders?

I ask these questions in response to a recent story on 60 Minutes regarding the decision of Amgen to halt clinical trials of GDNF for Parkinson's Disease. Some patients showed remarkable benefit, but the company has animal data that suggests serious side effects.

for the story, see: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/09/08/60minutes/main828098_page2.shtml

Most interesting, is that the patients in the clinical trial claim they are willing to sign a waiver promising not to hold the company liable if they could just continue receivng treatment. HOWEVER, they are suing Amgen to continue to provide the drug IN SPITE of having signed a waiver during the clinical trial acknowledging that the trial could be halted by the company for any reason.

How can Amgen (or any drug company) trust patients not to sue after signing a waiver, when they are already suing after signing a waiver???

A group of frogs is called an army.
A group of army officers is called a mess.


Replies

Send PM
See Mini bio

Status: Young Frog
Frog Laureate
Posted By Roshan
on 11/28/2005 14:24 PM   
Reply to this post Go to the top of the page

SanDiablo said:
1) Should patients be allowed to waive their rights in order to receive a drug that may have questionable side effects?

2) Do companies have a "moral obligation" to provide a drug that may benefit terminally ill patients, even if development or delivery of that drug is not cost effective, thus conflicting with the companies obligations to its shareholders?

I ask these questions in response to a recent story on 60 Minutes regarding the decision of Amgen to halt clinical trials of GDNF for Parkinson's Disease. Some patients showed remarkable benefit, but the company has animal data that suggests serious side effects.

for the story, see: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/09/08/60minutes/main828098_page2.shtml

Most interesting, is that the patients in the clinical trial claim they are willing to sign a waiver promising not to hold the company liable if they could just continue receiving treatment. HOWEVER, they are suing Amgen to continue to provide the drug IN SPITE of having signed a waiver during the clinical trial acknowledging that the trial could be halted by the company for any reason.

How can Amgen (or any drug company) trust patients not to sue after signing a waiver, when they are already suing after signing a waiver???


I can put myself in a patients's place with a terminal disease, if I wish to continue living and I have money I might really want to try anything and sign any documents. I think this is done in many cancer centers on patientrs who will accept to try drugs or procedures that are not approved by FDA yet as the last resource. This was the reason for the first heart transplant and many other transplants that were done in the history of medicine. Everybody knows they failed so many times. If a terminally ill patient wants to take a chance, he/she should be given a chance of survival.



As a Scientist Solutions member, you are able to register a positive vote for any topic which you believe is useful and relevant to our board or any reply which you believe is especially well worded and helpful.

By participating in the voting, you will be helping to identify the best topics & replies on the board.

You may vote once for any one post, and you may not vote for your own posts.

A post (topic or reply) will earn one "thumbs up" icon for every 10 votes received (up to 3 thumbs up), and the person who made the post will also earn two bonus points.

learn more about member points.



Click here to
Become a member & join our
community (It's easy & free)
Already a member? Please log in
User Name  
Password  
Forget Password?
Scientists
Not finding the answer you need?

Post a new topic

You must be logged in to post. Log in above.
Not a member yet? Click here to register
(it's free)
Thank You to Our Sponsor

The Latest Protocols

No protocols found.