ICPMS analysis for Titanium |
|
Would you like to save this topic, event, protocol or job so you can find it again easily?
Just click the "Save to My Lab Drawer" link and the item will be saved in the My Lab Drawer section of your bench space.
Available to members only. Please log in or register for your free account now.
|
|
Topic Started by Ronaldo
on 6/15/2009 14:33 PM
|
|
I keep getting a high bias for Titanium using mass spec. detection. Can't find any obvious reasons. Any suggestions?
|
Replies
|
|
|
Posted By ARGERINE
on 6/15/2009 14:36 PM
|
|
Hi Ronaldo
Can you give a more detailed explanation for your query about your experimental details and instrument that you are using. That way the members of the forum may be able to help you better.
Regards
Gaganjot Singh
Truth seems so closer now......
|
|
|
|
Posted By sps
on 6/15/2009 14:38 PM
|
|
Please check the purity of the sample and if you are using it a new, please check it with the manufacturers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, typically Ti is not one of the isotopes more susceptible to interference (polyatomic, isobaric, etc.) however anything is possible, and it would depend on the ICP-MS that you are using, the age, the conditions of the cones, etc.
I would lean more towards the reference standard that you are using. Ti is not very stable when mixed with other isotopes, which is why you will have a difficult time finding it included in many of the multi-element reference standards available from places such as CertiPrep, VHG, Perkin Elmer, etc. It is also why the leading supplier of PT samples for EPA certifications, Environmental Resource Associates, makes sure that they separate out Sn and Ti from the other elements in the PT sample, and you receive a separate sample for those two isotopes.
So I would start there. Can you tell us how you are preparing your calibration standards as well as how many isotopes you are scanning for at one time...or at least how many other isotopes you are calibrating for when you are analyzing for Ti?
Also some more info on the type of instrument you are using might be helpful as well...in the event it is not an issue with your reference standard.
If you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the percipitate!
|
|
As a Scientist Solutions member, you are able to register a positive vote for any topic which you believe is useful and relevant to our board or any reply which you believe is especially well worded and helpful.
By participating in the voting, you will be helping to identify the best topics & replies on the board.
You may vote once for any one post, and you may not vote for your own posts.
A post (topic or reply) will earn one "thumbs up" icon for every 10 votes received (up to 3 thumbs up), and the person who made the post will also earn two bonus points.
learn more about member points.
|
Become a member & join our community (It's easy & free)
Already a member? Please log in
|
TubeWriter
|
|
Chemglass Life Sciences
|
|
G. Heinemann
|
|
5/30/2009
|
|
5/30/2009
|
|
5/30/2009
|
|
7/27/2010
|
|
7/19/2010
|
|
3/4/2010
|
|
|