Scientist Solutions: Life Science Discussions
 Refer a Friend    Link To Us    Bookmark Us       

      
 » Home » Genomics » SNP Genotyping » SNP Genotyping

Other Topics
11/1/2008 11:56 AM
Programming help needed t ...
9/28/2008 03:19 PM
SNPlex
9/23/2008 12:39 PM
A question about differen ...
6/19/2008 03:55 PM
High throughput genotypin ...
5/12/2008 08:45 AM
SNaPshot
3/28/2008 11:45 AM
array CGH or TaqMan on wh ...
2/13/2008 04:37 AM
High throughput genotypin ...
1/29/2008 05:15 PM
MSX1 gene
10/29/2007 08:54 PM
Genotypes for HL60
1/28/2007 05:36 AM
PolyDoms - A web tool for ...
6/7/2006 03:15 PM
SNP genotyping and human ...
12/31/2005 12:58 PM
SNP on FFPE
8/26/2005 07:49 AM
HELP! Fragment analysis o ...
8/16/2005 04:28 AM
SNPs Report
6/2/2005 10:33 AM
Affy 50K SNP-CHIPs
1/5/2005 07:58 PM
anyone doing this for bac ...
12/23/2004 01:55 AM
Illumina SNP platform
Subscribet to topic
Add Reply  Add New Topic  Add New Poll
bottom of page RSS Feed 

Topic Feed

 

SNP Genotyping

 [View Printable]
Mans57

Frog Egg

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Jul 13, 2005







 Send a personal messsage to Mans57 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I want to genotype 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms. I know the exact sites of these polymorphisms. I want to know the best and most cost-effective system (ABI/Sequenom etc...) to do genotyping of 100 Samples. Secondly, for longer run if I have to the same thing but with the volume of about 40 samples per week for about more than 6 months is there any other better system?

.........................

 Posted Jul 13, 2005, 17:15 PM
labrat

Frog Laureate

See
Similar
Scientists





Group: Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Dec 20, 2004







 Send a personal messsage to labrat Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I've had a lot of experience with SNaPshot and have had success multiplexing assays for several SNPs. I'd say that 12 is easily done within one tube, but for 100 samples you might want to put them in more tubes to save on development costs.

Taqman is also good for small numbers of SNPs.

I would say for the numbers you're looking at, the deciding factors wouldn't be what is the best assay, but what equipment do you already have access to.

SNaPshot requires capillary electrophoresis equipment, and pcr, and Taqman just uses pcr.

Also, snapshot requires you to design your own primers, whereas Taqman is designed for you. Benefits to both, but it depends whether you want more control, or more manufacturer support.

I don't know much about prices I'm afraid because I don't get involved in all of that.

.........................

Posted Jul 14, 2005, 5:16 AM
top of page Add Reply  Add New Topic  Add New Poll

Forum Jump