<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel>
<title>abi 310 vs 3130</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t23902-abi+310+vs+3130.html</link>
<description>abi 310 vs 3130 Life Science Discussion</description>
<language>en-us</language> 
<managingEditor>sci7feed@sci7.nojunkorherepleasespam.com</managingEditor>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2005-05-05T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<item>
<title>abi 310 vs 3130</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t23902-abi+310+vs+3130.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi roroba,<br />Yours is a very tricky question because it depends highly on the number of samples you will be processing. The 3130 is a much more expensive instrument, but if you will be running hundreds of samples then you simply have to use a 3130. On the other hand if you will only be running a few samples at a time, then the 310 is the more appropriate instrument. At laboratories I have worked at that performed these types of experiments we had both instruments and used them depending on ...]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>abi 310 vs 3130</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t23902-abi+310+vs+3130.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi all,<br />I d like know if you have experience comparing econocmic cost (reparation and replace of parts...)  and comparing facility of handling in both DNA sequencer models . I know advantages of technology an automatization in 3130 but not expertise in this kind of machine. i wanna run microsatellites an sequencing.<br />Thanks in advance<br />Regards <br />Rodrigo<br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>
