<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel>
<title>FDA looking toward nanotechnology test for anthrax detection</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t9551-fda+looking+toward+nanotechnology+test+for+anthrax+detection.html</link>
<description> Life Science Discussion</description>
<language>en-us</language> 
<managingEditor>sci7feed@sci7.nojunkorherepleasespam.com</managingEditor>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2005-05-05T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<item>
<title>FDA looking toward nanotechnology test for anthrax detection</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t9551-fda+looking+toward+nanotechnology+test+for+anthrax+detection.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Of course biological significance will always be there even if the levels are low in terms of chances of getting out as an outbreak or even immuntiy levels. Stastically insignificant levels of highly pathogenic or zoonotic infections are a biological alarm.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FDA looking toward nanotechnology test for anthrax detection</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t9551-fda+looking+toward+nanotechnology+test+for+anthrax+detection.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the post.<br />I don't know anything about anthrax but the question is, does such an incredibly low detection level have any biological significance.  For instance, are the levels of anthrax LF toxin that this assay can detect, pathogenic at these concentrations.  Also, I wonder how quickly this assay can actually be run.<br />It is, however, obviously a fantastic step forward it terms of detecting anthrax for early treatment.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:25:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FDA looking toward nanotechnology test for anthrax detection</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t9551-fda+looking+toward+nanotechnology+test+for+anthrax+detection.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[I went through the article. Thanks for posting the information.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:38:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FDA looking toward nanotechnology test for anthrax detection</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t9551-fda+looking+toward+nanotechnology+test+for+anthrax+detection.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Quoting Nanotech Wire:<br />&amp;quot;The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has completed a &amp;quot;proof-of-concept&amp;quot; study of a test that quickly and accurately detects the presence of even the smallest amount of the deadly anthrax toxin.<br />&amp;quot;The FDA findings could form the basis of a test that allows earlier diagnosis of anthrax infection than currently possible,&amp;quot; said Indira Hewlett, Ph.D., the senior author of the study and chief of the Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Office of ...]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:00:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>
