<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel>
<title>Reversal potential and Equilibrium potential</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t19417-reversal+potential+and+equilibrium+potential.html</link>
<description> Life Science Discussion</description>
<language>en-us</language> 
<managingEditor>sci7feed@sci7.nojunkorherepleasespam.com</managingEditor>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2005-05-05T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<item>
<title>Reversal potential and Equilibrium potential</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t19417-reversal+potential+and+equilibrium+potential.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi !<br />I've recorded Na+ currents from neurons and I'm trying to fit activation and steady-state deactivation curve.<br />External sodium conc. was 127mM and internal  was 8.6 mM. <br />ENa is 67.8 mV predicted by the Nernst equation <br />but actual extrapolated reversal potential was near +42 mV<br />This deviation possibly arose from contamination outward currents or non-linearity arising form Goldman-type rectification.<br />Here is my question. <br />When I fit the activation curve, w...]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:07:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>
