http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t684-history+of+the+cell.html Remember Fathers of Science Life Science Discussion en-us sci7feed@sci7.nojunkorherepleasespam.com hourly 1 2005-05-05T12:00+00:00 http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t684-history+of+the+cell.html I think that's the basis of every living organism.
I refer you to the book called "The Cell" by someone called Swanson.
You can also find more information about the definition of "cell" through this http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=JournalURL&_cdi=7051&_auth=y&_acct=C000003298&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=28301&md5=629e3923951f00db1994a5f58f434e5c]]> Mon, 01 Aug 2005 00:52:42 GMT http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t684-history+of+the+cell.html Of course, cell is a "unit of life" but what is the living cell in its nature? That is the question! You understand me better if read the book you will find on this web page:
http://www.bioparadigma.spb.ru/revolution/contents.htm
Best regards,
Vladimir]]> Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:16:35 GMT http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t684-history+of+the+cell.html I am sorry for not quit understanding your arguments and your opinion regarding cell not to be considered as "unit of life". Your arguments seem to be more philosophical than real biology. You didn't give any example of what you think it should be the real definition of "the cell". Could you please elaborate more about your idea of "the cell"?
Thanks,
]]> Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:19:55 GMT http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t684-history+of+the+cell.html Waddington (1968), for all his outstanding contributions to biology in the middle and later part of the 20th century, failed to mention the cell as a concept in his paper 'Main biological conceptions'. The cell to him was a reality, an object for investigation, a fact. Only such a fundamental notion can so present itself to one's consciousness that one considers it "something that goes without saying" - an objective phenomenon, li...]]> Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:58:39 GMT