<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel>
<title>2D PAGEdetails</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t13089-2d+pagedetails.html</link>
<description> Life Science Discussion</description>
<language>en-us</language> 
<managingEditor>sci7feed@sci7.nojunkorherepleasespam.com</managingEditor>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2005-05-05T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<item>
<title>2D PAGEdetails</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t13089-2d+pagedetails.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, guy<br />Tell you the truth, I always counter your question. I think your 2d-gel elements should be fresh. And your electrophoresis buffer solution need to change!]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>2D PAGEdetails</title>
<link>http://www.scientistsolutions.com/t13089-2d+pagedetails.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, dear colleagues!<br />
<br />
Looking for your opinion! <br />
<br />
During perform 2D we suspest acrylamide and cystein group interactions leading to artefact results. When we perform 1D the same sample we got a lot of strips, but in 2D we have just a lot of spots and spindles on one level... <br />
<br />
Could you propose something? How can we prove or disprove that?<br />
<br />
And what do you think, how we can improve quality of separation? We work with affinity extracted protein (or mix) from pl...]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>
